Decision Maker: Mid Suffolk Cabinet
Decision status: Recommendations Approved
Is Key decision?: No
Is subject to call in?: Yes
It was RESOLVED:-
1.1 That the CIL Expenditure Business Plan (March 2019) and accompanying technical assessments of the CIL Bids forming Appendices A and B of the report and which include decisions on valid Bids for Cabinet to make and those for Cabinet to note be approved as follows: -
Decisions for Cabinet to take: Local Infrastructure Fund
CIL Bid, Location and Infrastructure Proposed |
Amount of CIL Bid |
Recommendation |
M1-18 GISLINGHAM Mill Street Erection of new building |
£44,568.75 Total Cost £160,596.60 (revised figure) Other remaining sources of funding for this project are: £57,431.25 from s106 funds (which will be spent on this project) £25,000 Garfield Weston £15,846.60 Band Funds £5000 Gislingham United Charity £4,000 - Gislingham Parish Council £3000 – Alfred Williams Charitable Trust £1000 Gislingham Variety £1000 – Council Fleming Locality Budget £1000 Ganzoni Charitable Trust £1800 – Personal Donations £500 Scarfe Trust £200 East of England Co-op £150 – Botesdale Parish Council £100 Eye Town Council |
Cabinet recommended to approve CIL Bid of £44,568.75
|
M20-18 THURSTON Norton road opposite the Community college and also adjacent to the Community college Provision of 2 new bus shelters |
£13,000 (amended figure) Total Cost £13,000 |
Cabinet recommended to to to approve CIL Bid of £13,000 |
M23-18 EYE Cross Street Car park Electric Vehicle charging station |
£20,728.40 Total cost £20,728.40 |
Cabinet recommended to to to approve CIL Bid of £20,728.40 |
Decisions for Cabinet to note and endorse: Local Infrastructure Fund
CIL Bid, Location and Infrastructure Proposed |
Amount of CIL Bid and total cost of the Infrastructure |
Delegated Decision |
M3 STOWUPLAND Trinity Meadows Church Road |
£641.35 Total cost £1282.35 Other remaining source of funding for this project are: - £641.00 Stowupland Parish Council |
Delegated decision has been taken to approve. For Cabinet to note.
|
1.2 Cabinet are asked to note and endorse that all other non-determined valid or invalid Bids continue to be worked upon and all will be carried forward to the next CIL Bid round 3 for consideration.
1.3 Cabinet are also asked to note and endorse this CIL Business Plan (which includes all those valid CIL Bids where offers of other sources of funding have been made for projects as part of the CIL process such that the value of that original CIL Bid is reduced).
Reason for Decision: Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) monies have been collected since the implementation of CIL on the 11th April 2016. The CIL Expenditure Framework adopted in April 2018 requires the production of a CIL Business Plan for each District which contains decisions for Cabinet to make or note and endorse on CIL Bids for CIL expenditure. These decisions relating to the expenditure of CIL monies form the one of the ways which necessary infrastructure supporting growth is delivered.
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected: There is a diverse spectrum of approaches to CIL expenditure across the country from Unitary Authorities who have absorbed CIL into their individual Capital Programmes to others who ringfence all funds to be spent locally. A range of different approaches was identified in Appendix A of the Framework for CIL Expenditure report provided to Cabinet’s on the 5th and 8th of February 2018 and discussed in full during the workshops with the Joint Member advisory panel. Members however adopted the documents set out in paragraph 1.1 above by Council decision in April 2018.
Any Declarations of Interest Declared: None
Any Dispensation Granted: None
Publication date: 04/03/2019
Date of decision: 04/03/2019
Decided at meeting: 04/03/2019 - Mid Suffolk Cabinet
Effective from: 14/03/2019
Accompanying Documents: