Agenda and draft minutes

Mid Suffolk Development Control Committee B - Wednesday, 6th January, 2021 9.30 am

Venue: Virtual Teams Video Meeting

Contact: Robert Carmichael - Email: committees@baberghmidsuffolk.gov.uk - 01449 724930

Items

No.

Item

33.

APOLOGIES AND SUBSTITUTIONS

Minutes:

Apologies were received from Councillor Peter Gould.

Councillor Richard Meyer substituted for Councillor Peter Gould.

34.

TO RECEIVE ANY DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY OR NON-PECUNIARY INTEREST BY MEMBERS

Minutes:

Councillor Stringer declared a local non-pecuniary interest in application number DC/20/01110 as he has relatives living on Union Road.

35.

DECLARATIONS OF LOBBYING

Minutes:

Councillor Mellen and Councillor Norris declared that they had been lobbied on application number DC/20/02052.

Councillor Guthrie declared she had been lobbied on application number DC/20/01110.

36.

DECLARATIONS OF PERSONAL SITE VISITS

Minutes:

Councillor Humphreys declared a personal site visit in respect of application number DC/20/01110.

37.

To Follow.

38.

TO RECEIVE NOTIFICATION OF PETITIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COUNCIL'S PETITION SCHEME

39.

Note: The Chairman may change the listed order of items to accommodate visiting Ward Members and members of the public.

Additional documents:

40.

Additional documents:

Recorded Vote
Title	Type	Recorded Vote text	Result
To refuse application DC/20/02052 as detailed in the officer reccomendation with the addition of an informative note regarding concerns over the Insufficent information on routing and potential harm on amenity within settlements nearby due to the traffic created	Resolution		Carried

41.

Additional documents:

Recorded Vote
Title	Type	Recorded Vote text	Result
To approve application DC/20/01110 as detailed in the officer recommendation with the amendment to the conditions as follows: A scheme for resource efficiency and sustainability including ev charging that demonstrates compliance with the NPPF para 148, 150 and 153 shall be agreed in writing prior to or concurrent with first reserved matters	Resolution		Rejected
That the Application be deferred for the following reasons: 1. Insufficent information submitted to demostrate there would not be a signfiant landscape imapct on rural character and locality to allow principle of 146 dwellings. 2. That Officers investigate and negotiate whether any further affordable homes could be secured.	Resolution		Carried