Venue: Frink Room (Elisabeth) - Endeavour House. View directions
Contact: Committee Services
Note: This meeting will not be livestreamed
No. | Item | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APOLOGIES AND SUBSITUTIONS Minutes: 81.1 Apologies for absence were received from Councillor Lee Parker.
81.2 Councillor Derek Davis substituted for Councillor Lee Parker. |
|||||||||||
DECLARATION OF INTERESTS Members to declare any interests as appropriate in respect of items to be considered at this meeting.
Minutes: 82.1 Councillor Busby declared a local non-pecuniary interest in respect of application numbers DC/21/03773 and DC/21/03772 as a Director of Babergh Growth, and advised the Committee that he would not take part in the debate or vote for these items.
82.2 Councillor Ayres declared a local non-pecuniary interest in respect of application number DC/21/05017 as a member of the Patient Partner Group. |
|||||||||||
PL/21/20 TO CONFIRM THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON 17 NOVEMBER 2021 PDF 146 KB To follow Minutes: It was RESOLVED:
That the minutes of the meeting held on 17 November 2021 were confirmed and signed as a true record.
|
|||||||||||
TO RECEIVE NOTIFICATION OF PETITIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COUNCIL'S PETITION SCHEME Minutes: 84.1 None received. |
|||||||||||
SITE INSPECTIONS In addition to any site inspections which the Committee may consider to be necessary, the Acting Chief Planning Officer will report on any other applications which require site inspections.
Minutes: 85.1 The Case Officer presented Members with a request for a site visit from Councillor Nunn and Councillor Malvisi regarding application number DC/21/05652 – Land West of Sudbury Road, Acton, CO10 0AX.
85.2 The Case Officer responded to questions from Members on issues including: the location of the industrial estate in relation to the proposed site, and any previous applications on the site.
85.3 Members debated the benefits of undertaking a site visit.
85.4 Councillor Owen proposed that the Committee undertake a site visit.
85.5 Councillor Osborne seconded the motion.
By a vote of 10 votes for and 1 against
It was RESOLVED:
A site visit should be undertaken (subject to a Covid risk assessment) in respect of application number DC/21/05652
|
|||||||||||
PL/21/21 PLANNING APPLICATIONS FOR DETERMINATION BY THE COMMITTEE PDF 57 KB An Addendum to Paper PL/21/21 will be circulated to Members prior to the commencement of the meeting summarising additional correspondence received since the publication of the agenda but before 12 noon on the working day before the meeting, together with any errata.
Additional documents: Minutes: In accordance with the Council’s arrangements for Public Speaking at Planning Committee, representations were made as detailed below relating to the items in Paper PL/21/21 and the speakers responded to questions put to them as provided for under those arrangements.
It was RESOLVED
That subject to the imposition of conditions or reasons for refusal (whether additional or otherwise) in accordance with delegated powers under Council Minute No. 48(a) (dated 19 October 2004) decisions on the items referred to in Paper PL/21/21 be made as follows:-
|
|||||||||||
DC/21/05017 FORMER LORRY PARK, STATION ROAD, SUDBURY, CO10 2SS PDF 508 KB Additional documents:
Minutes: 87.1 Item 6A
Application DC/21/05017 Proposal Full Application – Erection of two-storey, part three-storey GP Surgery and Pharmacy, with associated parking, external works and landscaping. Site Location SUDBURY – Former Lorry Park, Station Road, Sudbury, CO10 2SS Applicant Apollo Capital Project Developments Ltd
87.2 Councillor Ayres confirmed the Chair that she would remain on the Committee for the duration of the application, and not speak as Ward Member.
87.3 The Case Officer presented the application to the Committee outlining the proposal before Members including: the location and layout of the site, the location of the adjacent listed buildings and conservation area, the current use of the site, the proposed parking and access plans, and the officer recommendation of approval subject to drainage conditions as detailed in the committee report.
87.4 The Case Officer responded to questions from Members on issues including: the existing parking facilities at the site and any proposals for alternative facilities, the proposals compliance with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), the railway line, land contamination issues, and car parking enforcement plans.
87.5 The Agent responded to questions from Members on issues including: the plans for the existing surgery located in Great Cornard, the time limited parking restriction, access to the balcony and whether the applicant had considered a Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) contribution.
87.6 Members debated the application on issues including: the parking and access issues at the existing surgeries, potential traffic issues, and the benefits to the local community.
87.7 Councillor Owen proposed that the application be approved as detailed in the officer recommendation.
87.8 Councillor Osborne seconded the proposal.
87.9 Members continued to debate the application on issues including: access to the balcony.
87.10 The Case Officer and the Area Planning Manager responded to questions from Members on issues including: the proposal’s compliance with the NPPF, alternative sites considered for the development, potential traffic issues and the permitted parking time. 87.11 The Proposer and Seconder agreed to the following informative:
The applicant is requested to enter into discussions with the current landowner to ensure a longer permitted parking time than the 45 minutes which has been mentioned.
By a vote of 10 votes for and 1 against
It was RESOLVED:
That authority be delegated to the Chief Planning Officer to GRANT full planning permission subject to the prior conclusion of a surface water sequential test and resolution of surface water drainage arrangements, in consultation with the LLFA, to his satisfaction and
(1) Subject to the prior completion of a Section 106 Planning Obligation on appropriate terms to the satisfaction of the Chief Planning Officer as summarised below and those as may be deemed necessary by the Chief Planning Officer to secure:
• Diversion of public footpath 14 • Monitoring of the Travel Plan • Directional signs to the public footpaths
(2) Subject thereto that the Chief Planning Officer be authorised to GRANT Planning Permission subject to conditions as summarised below and those as may be deemed necessary by the Chief Planning Officer:
• Standard ... view the full minutes text for item 87.
|
|||||||||||
Additional documents:
Minutes: 88.1 Item 6B
Application DC/21/04056 Proposal Discharge of Conditions Application for B/15/01718 – Condition 30 (Construction Environmental Management Plan) Site Location SUDBURY – Chilton Woods Mixed Development to North of, Woodhall Business Park, Sudbury, Suffolk Applicant Taylor Wimpey London
88.2 A break was taken from 10:48am until 10:58am after application number DC/21/05017 and before the commencement of application number DC/21/04056.
88.3 The Case Officer introduced the application to the Committee outlining the proposal before Members including: the wording of the condition to be discharged, the previously approved applications at the site, the responses from the professional consultees, and the officer recommendation of approval subject to the three additional conditions as detailed in the presentation.
88.4 The Case Officer responded to questions from Members on issues including: air quality and environmental issues.
88.5 Members considered the representation from Sam Caslin who spoke on behalf of the Agent.
88.6 The Agent, and Chris Pritchard, the Site Manager, responded to questions from Members on issues including: liaison with the Ward Members, dust and air quality concerns, the Considerate Contractor scheme, enforcement of the speed limit for constructions vehicles whilst accessing the site and whilst on site and the water management plan.
88.7 Members considered the representation from Councillor Maybury who spoke as the Ward Member.
88.8 Members debated the application on issues including: the speed limit for construction vehicles.
88.9 Councillor Ayres proposed that the application be approved as detailed in the officer recommendation and subject to the additional conditions detailed in the officer presentation.
88.10 Councillor Beer seconded the proposal.
88.11 Members continued to debate the application on issues including: the consultation with the local community and the ongoing monitoring of the construction phases.
88.12 The Area Planning Manager provided clarification that the application related to the residential phase of the development and the wording would reflect this.
By a vote of 10 votes for and 1 abstention
It was RESOLVED:
That authority be delegated to the Chief Planning Officer to approve condition 30 of the Outline planning permission B/15/01718 subject to securing the following amendments:
· The addition of information in the CEMP which specifies an approval mechanism for construction works required outside of the agreed working hours. Such approval mechanism to include: details of such works outside of agreed hours, hours of such works, mitigation methods required as a result of such works and method to notify neighbours shall be submitted to the Local Planning Authority for approval no later than 7 working days before such event. · The addition of details of the appearance of the compounds in the CEMP. · The addition of a review mechanism whereby both the developer and Local Planning Authority can agree to amendments to the approved CEMP in the event of unforeseen circumstances.
|
|||||||||||
DC/21/03773 THE COTTAGE AND ADJOINING BUILDINGS, CORKS LANE, HADLEIGH PDF 247 KB Additional documents: Minutes: 89.1 Item 6C
Application DC/21/03773 Proposal Minor internal layout amendments to previously approved LBC ref: DC/18/04971 Site Location HADLEIGH – The Cottage & Adjoining Buildings, Corks Lane, Hadleigh Applicant Mr Daniel Hughes
89.2 A break was taken from 11:34am until 11:37am after application number DC/21/04056 and before the commencement of DC/21/03773.
89.3 Councillor Busby left the meeting at 11:34am.
89.4 The Case Officer presented the application to the Committee outlining the proposal before Members including: the layout and location of the site, the proposed internal amendments, the previously approved layout, and the officer recommendation of approval as detailed in the committee report.
89.5 The Case Officer responded to questions from Members on issues including: why the application had been referred to committee, and the reasons for the amendments to the layout.
89.6 Councillor McCraw proposed that the application be approved as detailed in the officer recommendation.
89.7 Councillor Osborne seconded the motion.
By a unanimous vote
It was RESOLVED:
That the application is GRANTED listed building consent and includes the following conditions:
· Standard time limit · Window and door details including joinery colour · Details of repairs · Details of all materials/fixtures · Landscaping and public realm details · Level 3 Archaeological building recording.
|
|||||||||||
DC/21/03772 RIVER VIEW AND ADJOINING BUILDINGS, CORKS LANE, HADLEIGH PDF 249 KB Additional documents: Minutes: 90.1 Item 6D
Application DC/21/03772 Proposal Application for Listed Building Consent. Minor internal, layout and River View elevation amendments to previously approved LBC ref: DC/18/04996 as per Design & Access Statement. Site Location HADLEIGH – River View & Adjoining Buildings, Corks Lane, Hadleigh Applicant Mr Daniel Hughes
90.2 The Case Officer presented the application to the Committee outlining the proposal before Members including: the layout and location of the site, the proposed amendments, the previously approved plans, and the officer recommendation of approval.
90.3 The Case Officer responded to questions from Members on issues including: whether there would be a change in the number of dwellings and bedrooms across the development.
90.4 Councillor Beer proposed that the application be approved as detailed in the officer recommendation.
90.5 Councillor Hinton seconded the proposal.
By a unanimous vote
It was RESOLVED:
That the application is GRANTED listing building consent and includes the following conditions:-
· Standard time limit · Window, door and railings details · Details of repairs · Details of all new materials and fixtures · Landscaping and public realm details · Level 3 Archaeological building recording · Joinery colour · Rainwater goods
|