Venue: King Edmund Chamber, Endeavour House, 8 Russell Road, Ipswich. View directions
Contact: Committee Services
No. | Item | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE AND SUBSTITUTIONS Minutes: 61.1 There were no apologies for absence. |
|||||||||||||
DECLARATION OF INTERESTS To receive any declarations of disclosable pecuniary interests and other registerable and non-registerable interests by Members.
Minutes: 62.1 There were no declarations of interest declared. |
|||||||||||||
PL/22/16 TO CONFIRM THE MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON 19 OCTOBER 2022 PDF 88 KB Minutes: 63.1 It was RESOLVED:
That the minutes of the meeting held on 19 October 2022 were confirmed and signed as a true record.
|
|||||||||||||
TO RECEIVE NOTIFICATION OF PETITIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COUNCIL'S PETITION SCHEME Minutes: 64.1 None received. |
|||||||||||||
SITE INSPECTIONS In addition to any site inspections which the Committee may consider to be necessary, the Chief Planning Officer will report on any other applications which require site inspections.
Minutes: 65.1 None received. |
|||||||||||||
PL/22/17 PLANNING APPLICATIONS FOR DETERMINATION BY THE COMMITTEE PDF 121 KB An Addendum to Paper PL/22/17 will be circulated to Members prior to the commencement of the meeting summarising additional correspondence received since the publication of the agenda but before 12 noon on the working day before the meeting, together with any errata.
Minutes: In accordance with the Council’s arrangements for Public Speaking at Planning Committee, representations were made as detailed below relating to the items in Paper PL/22/17 and the speakers responded to questions put to them as provided for under those arrangements.
It was RESOLVED
That subject to the imposition of conditions or reasons for refusal (whether additional or otherwise) in accordance with delegated powers under Council Minute No. 48(a) (dated 19 October 2004) decisions on the items referred to in Paper PL/22/17 be made as follows:-
|
|||||||||||||
Additional documents: Minutes: 67.1 Item 6A
Application DC/22/02336 Proposal Application for approval of Reserved Matters for Phase II (matters relating to appearance, scale, layout and landscaping) - Erection of 242no. dwellings, residential amenities, open space, parking and associated development details pursuant to Outline Planning Permission B/15/01718 dated 29.03.2018 Site Location SUDBURY – Chilton Woods Mixed Development to North of, Woodhall Business Park, Sudbury, Suffolk Applicant Taylor Wimpey East London (Limited)
67.2 The Case Officer presented the application to the Committee outlining the proposal before Members including: the location and layout of the site, the proposed access and highways plan, the proposed parking plan, the massing plan showing the height of the buildings on site, the housing mix including the location of affordable housing, the design code, the landscaping plans including open space provisions, proposed cycle paths and play areas, and the officer recommendation of approval with condition as detailed in the report.
67.3 The Case Officer responded to questions from Members on issues including: the definition of coach dwellings, the proposed number of triple parking spaces on site, whether there will be any grass verges outside the front of any dwellings, who would have responsibility for the maintenance of any bollards and fencing and roads which are not being adopted, access to the school site and associated parking, whether all of the dwellings in the apartment blocks would be affordable, the location of the cycleways, the safety and responsibility of the SUDS area, the future plans for management of public open spaces, the proposed landscaping and parking plans, waste management plans, and the ownership of the school site.
67.4 Members considered the representation from Samuel Caslin who spoke as the Applicant.
67.5 The Applicant responded to questions from Members on issues including: whether there were any plans to prohibit parking near the school, the adoptions of roads on the site, the materials used for the children’s play equipment, the provision of defibrillators, whether there were any plans for the provision of PV panels and street lighting, the proposed landscaping plans, and the length of time the management plan would be secured for.
67.6 The Case Officer and the Planning Lawyer responded to questions from Members regarding whether the management plan could be secured by condition, and confirmed that this would normally be included within the S.106 agreement. 67.7 The Applicant responded to further questions from Members on issues including: dust pollution issues, the landscaping plans including the advanced planting, and the location of waste bins.
67.8 The Case Officer provided clarification regarding the location of the waste bins as detailed in the comments from Waste Services.
67.9 The Applicant responded to further questions regarding the number of bungalows on site.
67.10 The Governance Officer read out a statement from Ward member Councillor Jan Osborne in support of the application.
67.11 Members debated the application on issues including: the adherence to the design code.
67.12 Councillor Barret proposed that the application be approved as detailed in the Officer recommendation.
67.13 Councillor Osborne seconded ... view the full minutes text for item 67.
|
|||||||||||||
DC/21/05110 LAND TO THE SOUTH OF, THOMPSON AND MORGAN, POPLAR LANE, SPROUGHTON, SUFFOLK PDF 256 KB Additional documents: Minutes: 68.1 Item 6B
Application DC/21/05110 Proposal Hybrid Application. Outline Planning Application for Interchange 55 comprising predominantly industrial (B2 use) and warehousing (B8 use) and prospective offices, research and light industry(E(g) (i, ii, iii) uses) buildings. Full Planning Application for access to the development and associated landscaping Site Location SPROUGHTON – Land to the South of, Thompson and Morgan, Poplar Lane, Sproughton, Suffolk Applicant Poplar Holdings Ltd & Building Partnerships Ltd
68.2 A break was taken from 11:22am until 11:34am, after application number DC/22/02336 and before the commencement of application number DC/21/05110.
68.3 The Case Officer introduced the application to the Committee outlining the proposal before Members including: the location of the site, the existing site layout, the proposed access and highways plan, the proposed layout of the site, the points of archaeological interest in the area, and the officer recommendation of approval as detailed in the report.
68.4 The Case Officer and the Senior Transport Planning Engineer responded to questions from Members on issues including: whether an alternative access point had been considered, the location of the proposed traffic congestion warning signs, and whether a potential future traffic flow analysis had been undertaken.
68.5 Members considered the representation from Peter Powell who spoke on behalf of Sproughton Parish Council.
68.6 The Parish Council representative responded to questions from Members on issues including: whether the Parish Council would object to the development if the proposed conditions were met, and wildlife corridors.
68.7 Members considered the representation from the Agent, Maureen Darrie, the Applicant, Paul Knowles, and the highways consultant, Aidan Fisher.
68.8 The team responded to questions from Members on issues including whether there had been any interest in the site from prospective tenants, the proposed access to the site, whether any consultation had taken place with the surrounding Parish Councils, and whether they could address any of the concerns from the Parish Councils.
68.9 The Case Officer provided clarification to Members regarding the proposed access to the site and the adjacent housing development site, and the expected timeline for access to works to commence.
68.10 The Applicant responded to further questions from Members on issues including: whether there was any evidence submitted regarding the need for employment land in the area.
68.11 The Governance Officer read out a statement from the Ward Member, Councillor Ric Hardacre, who was unable to attend the meeting.
68.12 The Governance Officer read out a statement from the Ward Member, Councillor Zac Norman, who was unable to attend the meeting.
68.13 Members debated the application on issues including: the proposed highways works including the shared access with the adjacent development, the potential increase in traffic, and the suitability of the site.
68.14 Councillor Busby proposed that the application be deferred to enable further consideration of the access to the site and to obtain a traffic model.
68.15 Councillor Jamieson seconded the motion.
68.16 Members continued to debate the application on issues including: the proposed archaeological conditions, the employment opportunities provided by the application, the professional ... view the full minutes text for item 68.
|